Submission Instructions:
All papers need to be submitted electronically through the EDAS website https://bss2025.edas.info/newPaper.php?c=34134 in PDF format.
Submitted papers must not substantially overlap with papers that have been published or that are simultaneously submitted to a journal or a conference with proceedings.
Papers must be clearly presented in English, must not exceed 6 pages in IEEE Computer Society Proceedings Format, including tables, figures, references and appendices.
The limit length of accepted papers should be 6 pages with 2 extra page charge.
Papers will be selected based on their originality, significance, relevance, and clarity of presentation assessed by at least three reviewers.
All submitted papers will be judged through double-blind reviews, where the identities of the authors are withheld from the reviewers. As an author, you are required to preserve the anonymity of your submission while at the same time allowing the reader to fully grasp the context of related past work, including your own. Papers that do not conform to our double-blind submission policies will be rejected without review.
Submission of a paper should be regarded as a commitment that, should the paper be accepted, at least one of the authors will register and attend the conference to present the work. IEEE Blockchain 2022 reserves the right to exclude a paper from distribution after the conference (e.g., removal from the digital library and indexing services), if the paper is not presented at the conference.
All accepted papers will be published in IEEE CPS proceedings (EI Indexed) and collected by IEEE Xplore Digital Library.
Instruction can also be found here: http://ieee-cybermatics.org/2025/blockchain/
Double-blind Submission
Remove the names and affiliations of authors from the title page.
Remove acknowledgments
Remove project titles or names that could be used to trace back to the authors via a web search.
Carefully refer to related work, particularly your own. Do not omit references to provide anonymity, as this leaves the reviewer incapable of grasping the context. Instead, reference your past work in the third person, just as you would any other piece of related work by another author. For example, instead of "In prior work [1], we presented a scheme that ...," sentences in the spirit of "In prior work, Clark et al. [1] presented a scheme that ..." should be used. With this method, the full citation of the referred paper can still be given, such as "[1] A. Clark ..., "Analysis of...", and it is not acceptable to say "[1] Reference deleted for double-blind review."